Pneumothorax as Complication of CT Guided Lung Biopsy: Frequency, Severity and Assessment of Risk Factors

Main Article Content

Gaurav Raj
Neha Kumari
Neha Singh
Kaustubh Gupta
Anurag Gupta
Pradyuman Singh
Hemant Gupta

Abstract

Background: CT-guided lung biopsy is routinely performed minimally invasive procedure. Imaging findings in the lung can have a broad differential diagnosis; therefore, it is indicated for definitive determination of pulmonary nodules or masses. Post-biopsy complications are common with most of them manageable in daycare. As pneumothorax is the most common complication, frequency and severity of pneumothorax with assessment of risk factors and follow-up for resolution is necessary.


Methods: A prospective evaluation of 123 biopsies with automated coaxial biopsy of 18 gauge was done. Post-biopsy pneumothorax was evaluated for its incidence and resolution. The studied risk factors were; patient age, sex, lesion location, lesion size, shortest pleural lesion depth, traversed lung parenchymal distance, presence of emphysema, fissure penetration, needle thoracic wall angle, and lesion characteristics.


Results: Reported immediate post-procedural pneumothorax was 22% with 19% of mild, 4% of moderate and 2.4% of severe cases. 51.9% of cases showed resolution within 24 hours. The intervention was required in only 4.8% of biopsy cases. A significant p - value of pneumothorax with the nodule depth increased traversed lung parenchymal distance, acute needle angle, fissure puncture, and presence of emphysema was seen. Emphysema was an independent variable in pneumothorax in multivariate analysis.


Conclusion: Pneumothorax is an unamenable consequence of CT-guided lung biopsy and a cautious approach should be kept in view of the variables that are associated with it to reduce its incidence and severity in patients.

Article Details

Raj, G., Kumari, N., Singh, N., Gupta, K., Gupta, A., Singh, P., & Gupta, H. (2025). Pneumothorax as Complication of CT Guided Lung Biopsy: Frequency, Severity and Assessment of Risk Factors. Journal of Radiology and Oncology, 9(1), 012–016. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jro.1001075
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Raj G, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJM, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M. Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(1):138–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8

Lang D, Reinelt V, Horner A, Akbari K, Fellner F, Lichtenberger P, et al. Complications of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018;130(7):288–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-018-1317-0

Huang MD, Weng HH, Hsu SL, Hsu LS, Lin WM, Chen CW, et al. Accuracy and complications of CT-guided pulmonary core biopsy in small nodules: a single-center experience. Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jul 23;19:51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0240-6

Li Y, Du Y, Yang HF, Yu JH, Xu XX. CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for small (≤20 mm) pulmonary lesions. Clin Radiol. 2013 Jan;68(1):e43-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.008

Elshafee AS, Karch A, Ringe KI, Shin H, Raatschen HJ, Soliman NY, et al. Complications of CT-guided lung biopsy with a non-coaxial semi-automated 18 gauge biopsy system: Frequency, severity and risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2019 Mar 18;14(3):e0213990. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213990

Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H, Shibamoto K, Inoue D, Matsui Y, et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement After CT Fluoroscopy–Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of the Procedures Conducted Over a 9-Year Period. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(3):809–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3224

Nour-Eldin NE, Alsubhi M, Emam A, Lehnert T, Beeres M, Jacobi V, et al. Pneumothorax Complicating Coaxial and Non-coaxial CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Determining Risk Factors and Management of Pneumothorax in a Retrospective Review of 650 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(2):261–70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1167-3

Gohari A, Haramati LB. Complications of CT Scan-Guided Lung Biopsy: Lesion Size and Depth Matter. Chest. 2004 Sep 1;126(3):666–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.3.666

Yeow KM, See LC, Lui KW, Lin MC, Tsao TC, Ng KF, et al. Risk factors for pneumothorax and bleeding after CT-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of lung lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(11):1305–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61556-5

Saji H, Nakamura H, Tsuchida T, Tsuboi M, Kawate N, Konaka C, et al. The Incidence and the Risk of Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Placement After Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: The Angle of the Needle Trajectory Is a Novel Predictor. Chest. 2002;121(5):1521–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.5.1521

Laurent F, Michel P, Latrabe V, Tunon de Lara M, Marthan R. Pneumothoraces and chest tube placement after CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy using a coaxial technique: incidence and risk factors. Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Apr 1;172(4):1049–53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587145

Zhang L, Shi L, Xiao Z, Qiu H, Peng P, Zhang M. Coaxial technique-promoted diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous cutting needle biopsy for small and deep lung lesions. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192920. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192920

Covey AM, Gandhi R, Brody LA, Getrajdman G, Thaler HT, Brown KT. Factors associated with pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring treatment after percutaneous lung biopsy in 443 consecutive patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(5):479–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rvi.0000124951.24134.50

Wu CC, Maher MM, Shepard J-AO. Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6):W678–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.10.4659